Cloud baseline

meta/muse-wonder Build2

meta/muse-wonder · scorer forge-2.0

meta/muse-wonder · single agentOct 15, 2026
Overall
0.2366
Benchmark
Forge 2.0
Model build
10m 21s

Recorded inference cost

$7.94

From the saved OpenRouter generation billing summary (118 recorded requests). Includes auxiliary model calls made during the build. Scoring reuses the saved build; this amount describes the original inference spend.

  • Billing recovered in a subsequent one-time historical lookup on 2026-10-15. All original generation records were found and native token reconciliation passed; the original missing-record summary remains archived.

Tier breakdown

Each bar is the tier's mean, from 0 to 1 (for E, its mean × the excellence gate). The percentage is the tier's share of the score. Mean × share, added over all tiers, is the tests earned figure below.

L · Lint and bundles1.001.06%
K · Platform currency1.001.32%
T · Event pipeline0.88742.11%
R · Reconcile0.86311.85%
S · Storage1.001.06%
B · Resolvers and permissions0.90741.58%
U · UI function0.76092.11%
V · Visual1.001.06%
A · Rovo0.6251.06%
E · Excellence0.78791.8%
R1 · Migration0.696112%
R2 · Dosing1.0013%
R3 · Time limits0.66678%
R4 · Changing world0.735710%
R5 · Admin panel0.966710%
R6 · CI web trigger1.008%
R7 · Custom field0.85365%
R8 · Forge LLM1.004%
R9 · Boot budget0.77785%
R10 · Native JQL0.745410%

Scoring detail

How this score was built

Per-test scorer output, as posted by the app. Expand a section to inspect its tests.

Correctness combines the lowest score for each test across the scoring fixtures; economy measurements use their mean. The combined result can therefore be lower than every individual fixture’s final score. Critical defects reduce the weighted result, followed by the reliability multiplier, before any score cap applies.

The rules behind these numbers: Forge 2.0 requirements, weights and score caps.

The score, step by step

0.8440 tests earned × 0.6000 critical defects × 0.4672 reliability = 0.2366 final score

tests earned = 0.15 × 0.8720 v1 + 0.7132 v2 (out of 0.85)

v1 = 0.88 × 0.8834 tiers L–A + 0.12 × 0.8863 gate × 0.8889 excellence

Critical defects: each class observed multiplies the whole score by 0.60, at most once.

  • r1_v1_rows_intact × 0.60v1 rows lost or corrupted by the migration.

Reliability: every tier in the breakdown above, except Excellence, is a group of tests. Each group of tests multiplies the score by 1 − 0.10 × the shortfall of its worst test: by 0.90 when that test fails completely, by 0.95 when it scores 0.5.

  • T Event pipeline: worst test t_reestimate_followed, score 0.3333 × 0.9333

    Already counted in this group: t_event_rows, t_out_of_order, t_multi_sprint_parse

  • R Reconcile: worst test r_heal_dropped, score 0 × 0.9000

    Already counted in this group: r_pagination

  • B Resolvers and permissions: worst test b_comment_adf_as_user, score 0.5 × 0.9500

    Already counted in this group: b_hidden_count

  • U UI function: worst test u_widget_live, score 0 × 0.9000

    Already counted in this group: u_widget_numbers, u_widget_chart, u_ledger_table, u_ledger_sort, u_llm_explain

  • A Rovo: worst test a_action_result, score 0 × 0.9000

    Already counted in this group: a_action_permissions

  • R1 Migration: worst test r1_v1_rows_migrated, score 0.8 × 0.9800

    Already counted in this group: r1_events_during_migration

  • R3 Time limits: worst test r3_long_retry_after_deferred, score 0 × 0.9000
  • R4 Changing world: worst test r4_field_switch, score 0.2692 × 0.9269

    Already counted in this group: r4_move_new_board, r4_deleted_history

  • R5 Admin panel: worst test r5_panel_labels, score 0.9 × 0.9900
  • R7 Custom field: worst test r7_values_fresh, score 0.7254 × 0.9725

    Already counted in this group: r7_writes_accepted

  • R9 Boot budget: worst test r9_widget_boot, score 0.6667 × 0.9667

    Already counted in this group: r9_sprint_boot

  • R10 Native JQL: worst test r10_initial_membership, score 0.5 × 0.9500

    Already counted in this group: r10_precomputation_refresh, r10_shared_permissions, r10_empty_and_closed

Priced as a critical defect instead, so no group counts them: r1_v1_rows_intact.

v1 is this run's score on the tests carried over from Forge 1.0: 15% of the total. v2 is the requirements R1–R10, each at its share of the score: the other 85%. Critical defects multiply the whole score, and so does each group of tests, by 1 − 0.10 × the shortfall of its worst test.

Excellence gate 0.8863: the average of the 18 conditions below, each counted at the value shown. Green is met in full; red is not, and lowers the gate. The 3 excellence tests are paid in proportion to the gate; together they are 1.8% of the total.

t_event_rows 0.9971r_heal_dropped 0.00u_widget_numbers 0.625u_ledger_table 0.8318b_comment_adf_as_user 0.50k_consumer_shape 1.00k_current_apis 1.00k_dashboard_widget 1.00k_entity_declared 1.00k_llm_model_current 1.00k_manifest_semantics 1.00k_rovo_mcp 1.00k_rovo_skill 1.00k_runtime_risks 1.00k_widget_edit_bridge 1.00v_console_clean 1.00v_csp_clean 1.00l_lint_warnings 1.00

Earned score 0.2366 · No cap applies · Final score 0.2366

Under a cap the final score is min(earned, cap − 0.05 × (1 − earned)): always below the cap, and closer to it the more the run earned. With no cap it is the earned score. Avoiding a cap adds no points.

The get-sprint-scope action returns exact numbers and the visible changes for the invoking person, returns errors instead of throwing, and the skill's SKILL.md tells the agent how to use it.

a action result

0.00

worst of 3 scoring sites (seed 3c04f61f28a4a511): 0/5 active sprints answered exactly

a action errors

1.00

2/2 bad sprintId inputs return {error} without throwing

a action permissions

0.50

worst of 3 scoring sites (seed 3c04f61f28a4a511): 6/12 per-person answers list exactly what that person may browse

a skill instructions

1.00

SKILL.md body 5/5: result fields named ['sprintName', 'committed', 'added', 'removed', 'creepPercent', 'hiddenChanges', 'changes']

Run notes and corrections

Reasoning disclosure: medium was selected by the app, but the actual outgoing requests omitted the reasoning parameter. Requested effort was unspecified; provider-effective effort is unmeasured. These actual completed builds are published by direct owner instruction with this disclosure, in a separate request-settings cohort. Native billed summary: cost unmeasured/incomplete; 118 generation IDs have no recovered billed record. This does not mean zero cost. Scores and original media are unchanged. Billing correction 2026-10-15: a subsequent manual lookup recovered all 118 original generation bills, totaling USD 7.9399858 including the auxiliary call. Native token reconciliation passed. This replaces the earlier unavailable or incomplete billing amount; the benchmark score and original run are unchanged.

Graded browser recording

Loading duration…

Watch the full graded browser recording at its original speed: the dashboard widget, the sprint action, the not-started sprint and the Forge LLM cases, as the scorer drove them on the run's own seed, the first of the three scoring sites. The test results and screenshots on this page provide the wider evidence. Pause or scrub to inspect a view.

The UI Kit admin panel is not in the recording: it is graded from its component tree.

Ready to play0:00 / —:—
Open recording file

Drag the timeline to seek. Keyboard: arrow keys move 5 seconds; Home and End jump to the start and end.

Full graded browser recording: dashboard widget (before configuration, edit and Save, light and dark at 380 px, a second instance at 1180 px), sprint action (light and dark, sort, issue link, select, comment post, double click, forbidden post, explain, close), the not-started sprint and the Forge LLM cases, where the app has each. The UI Kit admin panel is not in the recording.

Screenshots

Pictures from one of the three scoring sites, the one on the run's own seed. The dashboard widget and the sprint action are captured from the built app in a browser during grading. The admin panel picture is drawn by the benchmark from the app's component tree, not by Jira, and nothing is graded from that picture. A test keeps the score of its worst site (the excellence measurements keep their mean), so a test can fail on a site these pictures do not show. A detail that opens "worst of …" names the seed of the site the test scored worst on, which can be the pictured one.

1Dashboard widget · light
2Dashboard widget · dark
3Sprint action · light
4Sprint action · dark
5Admin panel (UI Kit) · light: drawn by the benchmark from the app's component tree, not by Jira.

Run details

Model
meta/muse-wonder
Engine events
0
Repair rounds
0
Started
Oct 15, 2026, 05:06 PM
Finished
Oct 15, 2026, 05:39 PM

How the benchmark is scored